Paedagogie

Artikel

Efektivitas Metode Presentasi dalam Pembelajaran terhadap Pengembangan Nalar Kritis Mahasiswa: Studi Kualitatif

Fadhil Ikhsan Nur Ramadhan , Risky Fajriyatuz Zahro

Published
5 Juni 2026

Vol 21 No 2 (2026)
Pages 1927-1932

DOI

Open Access
Share

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektivitas metode presentasi dalam pembelajaran terhadap pengembangan nalar kritis mahasiswa. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian deskriptif. Subjek penelitian terdiri dari lima mahasiswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran dengan metode presentasi. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui wawancara mendalam, sedangkan analisis data menggunakan model interaktif yang meliputi reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa metode presentasi merupakan metode yang dominan digunakan dalam pembelajaran, namun belum sepenuhnya efektif dalam mengembangkan nalar kritis mahasiswa. Hal ini ditunjukkan oleh rendahnya partisipasi mahasiswa, terbatasnya pemahaman materi, serta kurangnya interaksi dalam proses pembelajaran. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pengelolaan metode pembelajaran yang lebih optimal untuk meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran.

Keywords

Metode Presentasi; Nalar Kritis; Pembelajaran; Mahasiswa

Referensi

  1. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning. Longman.
  2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice-Hall.
  3. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. Open University Press.
  4. Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning. ASHE-ERIC.
  5. Brookfield, S. D. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  6. Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills. ASCD.
  7. Chakarvarti, P. (2023). Investigating the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Undergraduate Students. Journal of Education Review Provision, 2(3), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.55885/jerp.v2i3.192
  8. Cheng, C. (2026). A Review of Benefits, Challenges, and Strategies of Students’ Oral Presentation in Higher Education. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BASIC EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 03. https://doi.org/10.14421/8r0xp858
  9. Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243.
  10. Ennis, R. H. (2015). Critical thinking: A streamlined conception. Teaching Philosophy, 38(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil20153811
  11. Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.
  12. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance. PNAS, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
  13. Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-learning in the 21st century. Routledge.
  14. Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. Psychology Press.
  15. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. Routledge.
  16. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 1–12.
  17. Kahu, E. R. (2013). Student engagement framework. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773.
  18. Kember, D. (2016). Understanding student motivation. Educational Research Review, 18, 1–14.
  19. Love Concepcion, W. E., Garcia-Bolaños, J., Mae Corpuz Nadia E H Ali, A. B., & Mae Ordoviz, J. F. (2023). GLOSSOPHOBIA AMONG SCIENCE MAJOR STUDENTS: LEVEL, EFFECTS, AND COPING MECHANISMS IN CLASSROOM PRESENTATION PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION: A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL Glossophobia Among Science Major Students: Level, Effects, and Coping Mechanisms in Classroom Presentation. Psych Educ, 15(3), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10154692
  20. Matthew B. Miles, A. Michael Huberman, & Johnny Saldana. (2014). Qualitative-Data-Analysis.
  21. Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  22. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2014). Formative assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 199–218.
  23. Ormrod, J. E. (2020). Educational psychology. Pearson.
  24. Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2019). Critical thinking concepts. Foundation for Critical Thinking.
  25. Paulsen, M. B., & Feldman, K. A. (2015). Teaching effectiveness. Review of Educational Research, 85(1), 1–43.
  26. Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
  27. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
  28. Prof. Dr. Sugiyono. (2020). METODE PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF.
  29. Rita Fiantika, F., Wasil, M., & Jumiyati, S. (2022). METODOLOGI PENELITIAN KUALITATIF. www.globaleksekutifteknologi.co.id
  30. Samsudin, N., Mohd Hairi, H., Othman, N., Manshor, R., Syafiq Md Salleh, & Okfalisa. (2025). Exploring Aspects of Public Speaking Anxiety. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS, IX(IX). https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS
  31. Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories. Pearson.
  32. Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational psychology. Pearson.
  33. States, N. E., Lovig, C., Martin, K., Nennig, H. T., & Cole, R. S. (2023). Let Students Work: Analysis of the Role of Differing Facilitation on Student Engagement in a Large Stadium-Style Lecture Hall. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(11), 4237–4248. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00750
  34. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
  35. Topping, K. J. (2015). Peer learning. Educational Psychology, 35(5), 1–16.
  36. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
  37. Xhomara, N. (2022). Critical thinking: student-centred teaching approach and personalised learning, as well as previous education achievements, contribute to critical thinking skills of students. In Int. J. Learning and Change (Vol. 14, Number 1).
  38. Zeng, X., & Ravindran, L. (2025). Design, implementation, and evaluation of peer feedback to develop students’ critical thinking: A systematic review from 2010 to 2023. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101691
  39. Zepke, N. (2015). Student engagement. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(2), 1–14.
  40. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
Article Metrics
144
Views
33
Downloads

SCITE

DIMENSIONS

Publication Information
Published 5 Juni 2026
Section Artikel
Copyright Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Paedagogie
Keywords
  • Metode Presentasi
  • Nalar Kritis
  • Pembelajaran
  • Mahasiswa