Paedagogie

Artikel

Dominasi Scholar Academic dalam Kurikulum Pesantren: Studi Ideologi Kurikulum Pendidikan Islam Perspektif Michael Schiro

Muhammad Iqbal Rosyid , Muhammad Nur Adibuddin , Ahmad Faid Muzakky , Muhamad Yusuf Amin Nugroho

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menelaah dominasi ideologi Scholar Academic dalam kurikulum pesantren dengan menggunakan perspektif Michael Schiro. Kajian ini menerapkan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif dengan jenis studi pustaka. Data penelitian diperoleh dari literatur primer dan sekunder yang membahas ideologi kurikulum, pendidikan pesantren, kitab kuning, otoritas kiai, metode pembelajaran, serta evaluasi santri. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui penelusuran, pemilihan, dan telaah kritis terhadap berbagai sumber ilmiah yang relevan. Selanjutnya, data dianalisis menggunakan analisis isi kualitatif terarah dengan mengacu pada empat kategori ideologi kurikulum Schiro, yaitu Scholar Academic, Social Efficiency, Learner Centered, dan Social Reconstruction. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa kurikulum pesantren memiliki kecenderungan kuat terhadap Scholar Academic. Kecenderungan tersebut tampak melalui posisi sentral kitab kuning, pewarisan ilmu agama klasik, otoritas keilmuan kiai, serta evaluasi yang berlandaskan penguasaan teks. Meskipun demikian, dominasi tersebut tidak bersifat kaku karena tetap mengandung nilai humanistik melalui pembentukan adab, keteladanan, khidmah, dan pendampingan santri. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Scholar Academic Pesantren merupakan corak kurikulum khas yang memadukan penguasaan ilmu, keberlanjutan tradisi, dan pemanusiaan santri.

Keywords

Scholar Academic; Kurikulum Pesantren; Michael Schiro

Referensi

  1. Aimah, S., & Nasih, M. (2024). Transformation of Pesantren as Humanistic and Futuristic Educational Institutions. Journal of Research in Educational Management, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.71392/jrem.v3i1.32
  2. Alyaqoub, R., Alsharairi, A., & Aslam, M. Z. (2024). Elaboration of Underpinning Methods and Data Analysis Process of Directed Qualitative Content Analysis for Communication Studies. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 24(02), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v24i2.573
  3. Anjaludin, & Pratama, A. I. (2025). Integration of Pesantren Curriculum with Digital Technology: Challenges and Opportunities in Islamic Education. 02(01), 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61159/icop.v2i1.594
  4. Arif, M., Dorloh, S., & Abdullah, S. (2024). A Systematic Literature Review of Islamic Boarding School (Pesantren) Education in Indonesia (2014-2024). Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman, 35(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.33367/tribakti.v35i2.5330
  5. Arif, M., Nasir, R., & Ma’arif, M. A. (2025). The Kitab Kuning Learning Model in the Development of Student Expertise in Pesantren-Based Higher Education. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v8i1.8
  6. Chand, S. P. (2025). Methods of Data Collection in Qualitative Research: Interviews, Focus Groups, Observations, and Document Analysis. Advances in Educational Research and Evaluation, 6(1), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.25082/AERE.2025.01.001
  7. Hidayati, Z., Maulidi, A., Niam, K., & Zainiyati, H. S. (2025). Curriculum As A Mirror Of Ideological Affiliation: Rethinking Pesantren Typologies in the Landscape of Indonesian Islamic Organizations. Journal of Contemporary Islam and Muslim Societies, 9(1), 201. https://doi.org/10.30821/jcims.v9i1.24574
  8. Idris, M., Willya, E., Mokodenseho, S., & Musthan, Z. (2023). Child-Friendly Islamic Boarding School (CFIBS): Realizing Humanistic Goals of Islamic Education. Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education, 7(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v7i1.382
  9. Istibana, & Aimah, S. (2024). Analisis Nilai-Nilai Humanis dalam Kurikulum Pesantren dan Relevansinya bagi Pendidikan Modern di MAN 1 Banyuwangi. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(4), 01–25. https://doi.org/10.62007/joupi.v2i4.379
  10. Julya, A. I., Nasiha, D., Aulia, M. A., & Sirojuddin, M. (2025). Dinamika Kurikulum Pesantren di Indonesia. 10(01), 105–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15642/joies.2025.10.1.105-122
  11. Kartikasari, V., Basri, H., Zakiyah, N., & Zakiaria, A. R. (2022). Humanistic Approach in Islamic Religious Education Curriculum Development. Belajaea: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.51192/almunadzomah.v1i2.320
  12. Khairani, D., Salminawati, & Dahlan, Z. (2025). Implementation of Islamic Educational Methods in Kitab Kuning Learning at NU Al-Qomariyah Islamic Boarding School. 14(02), 336–349. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32806/jf.v14i2.1369
  13. Lim, W. M. (2025). What Is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. 33(2), 199–299. https://doi.org/journals.sagepub.com/home/anz
  14. Maftuhah, M., Bastami, B., Heriadi, H., Tuaini, T., Surindi, S., Rahman, M., & Khozin, K. (2026). Transformation of English-Based Kitab Kuning Learning Methods Through the Integration of Pesantren Tradition and the Modernization of Instruction in Islamic Boarding Schools. Scaffolding: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Dan Multikulturalisme, 7(2), 1146–1164. https://doi.org/10.37680/scaffolding.v7i2.9019
  15. Maftuhin, Hajjaj, W. A., & Taufiqurrahman. (2025). Manajemen Kurikulum Terintegrasi di Pesantren: Integrasi Kitab Kuning dan Kompetensi Abad Ke-2. 02(01), 321–334. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23960/almustofa
  16. Mas’udi, A. T. (2024). The Evolution of Pesantren Education: Continuity and Change in Curriculum and Management amid Modernization. Journal of Pesantren and Diniyah Studies, 1(2), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.63245/jpds.v1i2.23
  17. Mutammam, Anggraeni, D., Akhmad Afroni, Sutrisno, Aisyah Zubaidah, & Irfanullah, G. (2025). Adaptation and Transformation of Pesantren Education in Facing The Era of Muslim Society 5.0. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(3), 705–726. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v7i3.114
  18. Neupane, B. P., Dahal, N., Dhakal, R. K., Hasan, Md. K., Villarama, J. A., & Fabros, B. G. (2026). Data collection methods in qualitative research: Researchers’ reflections. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 11, 1778160. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2026.1778160
  19. Noble, H., & Smith, J. (2025). Ensuring validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evidence Based Nursing, 28(4), 206–208. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2024-104232
  20. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  21. Rustamana, A., Adillah, P. M., Maharani, N. K., & Fayyedh, A. (2024). Qualitative Research Methods. 2(6), 919–930. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55927/marcopolo.v2i6.9907
  22. Schiro, M. S. (2007). Curriculum Theory: Conflicting Visions and Enduring Concerns. SAGE Publications.
  23. Schlunegger, M. C., Zumstein-Shaha, M., & Palm, R. (2024). Methodologic and Data-Analysis Triangulation in Case Studies: A Scoping Review. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 46(8), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459241263011
  24. Sunarya, E., & Sassi, K. (2026). Curriculum Of Love: Efforts To Revitalise Humanism In Islamic Education. 7(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37567/ijgie.v7i1.4323
  25. Surawy-Stepney, N., Provost, F., Bhangu, S., & Caduff, C. (2023). Introduction to qualitative research methods: Part 2. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 14(2), 95–99. https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_37_23
  26. Thulo, A. (2026). Examining the Dominant Ideology in the History Curriculum: A Case Study of Lesotho’s Grade 9 History Syllabus. 3(1), 84–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.63081/uejtl.v3i1.129
  27. Villamin, P., Lopez, V., Thapa, D. K., & Cleary, M. (2025). A Worked Example of Qualitative Descriptive Design: A Step‐by‐Step Guide for Novice and Early Career Researchers. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 81(8), 5181–5195. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16481