Mechanical Engineering for Society and Industry

Articles

Application of response surface methodology (RSM) and central composite design (CCD) to optimize of green ammonia production using magnetic induction method (MIM) and nanocatalysts

Poppy Puspitasari , Nandang Mufti , Ahmad Atif Fikri , Deny Yudo Wahyudi , Maizatul Shima binti Shaharun , Anisa Ur Rahmah , Diki Dwi Pramono

Published
June 30, 2025

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025)
Pages 303-318

DOI

Open Access
Share

Abstract

Ammonia synthesis in conventional industrial plants typically employs fused iron-based catalysts under harsh conditions (temperatures of 400–700 °C and pressures exceeding 300 atm), resulting in significant energy consumption. This study investigates the potential of using a Mn0.8Zn0.2Fe2O4 catalyst, synthesized under varying sintering temperatures and magnetic field inductions, to enable ammonia synthesis under milder conditions. Additionally, process optimization was carried out using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Central Composite Design (CCD). Catalyst characterization results indicate that the crystallite size of Mn0.8Zn0.2Fe2O4 increases with higher sintering temperatures. The catalyst exhibits a near-spherical morphology with notable agglomeration. Magnetic property analysis shows that samples sintered at 700 °C and 900 °C display ferrimagnetic behavior, while the sample sintered at 1100 °C exhibits ferromagnetic characteristics. Temperature-Programmed Reduction (TPR) revealed a maximum reduction peak at 788 °C for the catalyst sintered at 1100 °C, indicating enhanced reducibility. Ammonia formation was successfully achieved using a Helmholtz coil-assisted synthesis method, where the produced ammonia was captured in acidic and basic media in the form of NH₄OH and (NH₄)₂SO₄, confirming the catalytic activity of Mn0.8Zn0.2Fe2O4. The RSM model demonstrated high accuracy with an R² value of 99.73%, and residual analysis confirmed normal distribution, validating model assumptions. The optimal synthesis parameters determined were a sintering temperature of 700 °C, magnetic induction of 0.14 T, and a reaction temperature of 28 °C. The minimal deviation between predicted and experimental responses confirms the reliability and predictive accuracy of the quadratic regression model.

Keywords

Ammonia synthesis; Nanocatalysts; MIM; RSM; CCD

References

  1. [1] S. Giddey, S. P. S. Badwal, and A. Kulkarni, “Review of electrochemical ammonia production technologies and materials,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 38, no. 34, pp. 14576–14594, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.054.
  2. [2] H. Liu, Ammonia Synthesis Catalysts: Innovation and Practices. Singapore: World Scientific / Chemical Industry Press, China, 2013. doi: 10.1142/8199.
  3. [3] A. Yapicioglu and I. Dincer, “A review on clean ammonia as a potential fuel for power generators,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 103, pp. 96–108, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.023.
  4. [4] J. N. Sahu, S. Hussain, and B. C. Meikap, “Studies on the hydrolysis of urea for production of ammonia and modeling for flow characterization in presence of stirring in a batch reactor using computational fluid dynamics,” Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1380–1385, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1007/s11814-010-0524-9.
  5. [5] P. Puspitasari, J. A. Razak, and N. Yahya, “Ammonia synthesis using magnetic induction method (MIM),” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2012, pp. 605–610. doi: 10.1063/1.4757543.
  6. [6] S. H. Chien, L. I. Prochnow, S. Tu, and C. S. Snyder, “Agronomic and environmental aspects of phosphate fertilizers varying in source and solubility: an update review,” Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 229–255, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1007/s10705-010-9390-4.
  7. [7] B. Azeem, K. KuShaari, Z. B. Man, A. Basit, and T. H. Thanh, “Review on materials & methods to produce controlled release coated urea fertilizer,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 181, pp. 11–21, May 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.02.020.
  8. [8] S. Sunaryo, S. Sutoyo, S. Suyitno, Z. Arifin, T. Kivevele, and A. I. Petrov, “Characteristics of briquettes from plastic pyrolysis by-products,” Mechanical Engineering for Society and Industry, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 57–65, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.31603/mesi.9114.
  9. [9] W. Rarogpilecka et al., “Carbon-supported ruthenium catalysts for NH3 synthesis doped with caesium nitrate: Activation process, working state of Cs–Ru/C,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 239, no. 2, pp. 313–325, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2006.01.035.
  10. [10] N. Lashari and T. Ganat, “Emerging applications of nanomaterials in chemical enhanced oil recovery: Progress and perspective,” Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1995–2009, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cjche.2020.05.019.
  11. [11] M. A. Shipman and M. D. Symes, “Recent progress towards the electrosynthesis of ammonia from sustainable resources,” Catalysis Today, vol. 286, pp. 57–68, May 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2016.05.008.
  12. [12] K. Ke, G. Wang, D. Cao, and G. Wang, “Recent Advances in the Electro‑Oxidation of Urea for Direct Urea Fuel Cell and Urea Electrolysis,” in Electrocatalysis, 2020, pp. 41–78. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-43294-2_2.
  13. [13] V. Polshettiwar and T. Asefa, Nanocatalysis Synthesis and Applications. Wiley, 2013. doi: 10.1002/9781118609811.
  14. [14] P. Puspitasari and N. Yahya, “Development of ammonia synthesis,” in 2011 National Postgraduate Conference, IEEE, Sep. 2011, pp. 1–4. doi: 10.1109/NatPC.2011.6136449.
  15. [15] S. Nazzal and M. A. Khan, “Response surface methodology for the optimization of ubiquinone self-nanoemulsified drug delivery system,” AAPS PharmSciTech, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 23–31, Mar. 2002, doi: 10.1208/pt030103.
  16. [16] T. Damena and T. Alansi, “Review: Low Cost, Environmentally Friendly Humic Acid Coated Magnetite Nanoparticles (HA-MNP) and Its Application for the Remediation of Phosphate from Aqueous Media,” Journal of Encapsulation and Adsorption Sciences, vol. 08, no. 04, pp. 256–279, 2018, doi: 10.4236/jeas.2018.84013.
  17. [17] P. Puspitasar, N. Yahya, N. A. M. Zabidi, and N. A. Ahmad, “Comparison of Mechanical Properties and Magnetic Properties of Mn0.8Zn0.2Fe2O4 Synthesized by Conventional Ball Milling and Self Combustion Method,” Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 1199–1205, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.3923/jas.2011.1199.1205.
  18. [18] P. Puspitasari, A. Andoko, H. Suryanto, P. Risdanareni, and J. J. Ekaputri, “Properties of Mn 0.4 Zn 0.6 Fe 2 O 4 and Mn 0.6 Zn 0.4 Fe 2 O 4 as Nanocatalyst for Ammonia Production,” MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 97, p. 01029, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/20179701029.
  19. [19] K. H. Tshai, N. Yahya, F. K. Chong, and V. V. Yap, “Optimization of green synthesis of ammonia by magnetic induction method using response surface methodology,” in 3rd International Conference on Fundamental and Applied Sciences (ICFAS 2014): Innovative Research in Applied Sciences for a Sustainable Future, 2014, pp. 223–230. doi: 10.1063/1.4898470.
  20. [20] A. A. Bunaciu, E. gabriela Udriştioiu, and H. Y. Aboul-Enein, “X-Ray Diffraction: Instrumentation and Applications,” Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 289–299, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1080/10408347.2014.949616.
  21. [21] D. D. Pramono and P. Puspitasari, “Comparison of physicochemical properties of hydroxyapatite from scallop shell synthesized by wet chemical method with and without sonication process,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Green Engineering & Technology 2022 (IConGETech 2022), Arau: AIP Conference Proceedings, 2024, p. 040034. doi: 10.1063/5.0199107.
  22. [22] S. H. Jaafar et al., “Influence of Calcination Temperature on Crystal Growth and Optical Characteristics of Eu3+ Doped ZnO/Zn2SiO4 Composites Fabricated via Simple Thermal Treatment Method,” Crystals, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 115, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.3390/cryst11020115.
  23. [23] V. Lakshmi Narayana and L. Bhaskara Rao, “A brief review on the effect of alkali treatment on mechanical properties of various natural fiber reinforced polymer composites,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 44, pp. 1988–1994, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.117.
  24. [24] A. A. Mirzaei, H. R. Shaterian, S. H. Taylor, and G. J. Hutchings, “Co-precipitated Copper Zinc Oxide Catalysts for Ambient Temperature Carbon Monoxide Oxidation: Effect of Precipitate Aging Atmosphere on Catalyst Activity,” Catalysis Letters, vol. 87, no. 3–4, pp. 103–108, Apr. 2003, doi: 10.1023/A:1023416819195.
  25. [25] M. A. Gabal et al., “Recovery of Mn0.8Zn0.2Fe2O4 from Zn–C battery: auto-combustion synthesizes, characterization, and electromagnetic properties,” Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 526–537, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10971-021-05608-9.
  26. [26] Y. Liu, S. Zhu, Z. Gu, C. Chen, and Y. Zhao, “Toxicity of manufactured nanomaterials,” Particuology, vol. 69, pp. 31–48, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.partic.2021.11.007.
  27. [27] C. B. Carter and M. G. Norton, Ceramic Materials. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2013. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3523-5.
  28. [28] W. D. Callister and D. G. Rethwisch, Materials science and engineering: an introduction, vol. 9. Wiley New York, 2018.
  29. [29] C. Chacon and O. Isnard, “Crystal and magnetic structure of YCo4−xFexB,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 71–75, Jan. 2001, doi: 10.1063/1.1331067.
  30. [30] Z. Luo et al., “Effect of sintering temperature on microstructure and magnetic properties for Fe-Si soft magnetic composites prepared by water oxidation combined with spark plasma sintering,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 491, p. 165615, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165615.
  31. [31] M. D. Nguyen, H.-V. Tran, S. Xu, and T. R. Lee, “Fe3O4 Nanoparticles: Structures, Synthesis, Magnetic Properties, Surface Functionalization, and Emerging Applications,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 23, p. 11301, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.3390/app112311301.
  32. [32] Q. Tang and K. Huang, “Determining the kinetic rate constants of Fe3O4-to-Fe and FeO-to-Fe reduction by H2,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 434, p. 134771, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.134771.
  33. [33] T. P. Almeida, M. W. Fay, Y. Zhu, T. W. Hansen, R. Dunin-Borkowski, and P. D. Brown, “Environmental TEM investigation of the reduction of α-Fe 2 O 3 nanorods under H 2 atmosphere,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 371, p. 012049, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/371/1/012049.
  34. [34] J. Li, J. Gao, X. Wang, Y. Guo, and F. Cheng, “Spinel Ferrite Transformation for an Efficient Fe Removal from Circulating Fluidized Bed Fly Ash by Carbothermal Reduction at a Low Temperature,” ACS Omega, vol. 7, no. 22, pp. 18612–18622, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c01277.
  35. [35] J. Marugán, J. A. Botas, M. Martín, R. Molina, and C. Herradón, “Study of the first step of the Mn2O3/MnO thermochemical cycle for solar hydrogen production,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 7017–7025, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.10.124.
  36. [36] R. Findorák et al., “Experiments and Simulations on the Low-Temperature Reduction of Iron Ore Oxide Pellets with Hydrogen,” Metals, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 289, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.3390/met15030289.
  37. [37] X. Xu et al., “Size-Dependent Reduction Kinetics of Iron Oxides in Single and Mixed Mineral Systems,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 2519–2530, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c08032.
  38. [38] J. M. Bellosta von Colbe et al., “Scale-up of milling in a 100 L device for processing of TiFeMn alloy for hydrogen storage applications: Procedure and characterization,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 44, no. 55, pp. 29282–29290, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.174.
  39. [39] V. Bansal, C. Bansal, and S. K. Dhawan, “Charge transport and ammonia sensing response in poly (aniline-co-1-amino-2-naphthol-4-sulphonic acid),” Indian Journal of Engineering & Materials Sciences, vol. 16, pp. 355–363, 2009.
  40. [40] M. Kumari and S. K. Gupta, “Removal of aromatic and hydrophobic fractions of natural organic matter (NOM) using surfactant modified magnetic nanoadsorbents (MNPs),” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 25, no. 25, pp. 25565–25579, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2611-0.
  41. [41] J. Bayuo, B. Kenneth, and A. A. Moses, “Optimization of Adsorption Parameters for Effective Removal of Lead (II) from Aqueous Solution,” Physical Chemistry: An Indian Journal, vol. 14, no. 1, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://www.tsijournals.com
  42. [42] D. Nahemiah, I. Nkama, and B. Mamudu, “Application of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Central Composite Design (CCD) to Optimize Minerals Composition of Rice-Cowpea Composite Blends during Extrusion Cooking,” International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition Engineering, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 40–52, 2015, doi: 10.5923/j.food.20150501.06.
  43. [43] M. Kumari and S. K. Gupta, “Response surface methodological (RSM) approach for optimizing the removal of trihalomethanes (THMs) and its precursor’s by surfactant modified magnetic nanoadsorbents (sMNP) - An endeavor to diminish probable cancer risk,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 18339, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54902-8.
  44. [44] J. A. Razak, S. Sufian, K. Z. Ku Shaari, P. Puspitasari, T. K. Hoe, and N. Yahya, “Synthesis, characterization and application of Y[sub 3]Fe[sub 5]O[sub 12] nanocatalyst for green production of NH[sub 3] using magnetic induction method (MIM),” in International Conference on Fundamental and Applied Sciences 2012: (ICFAS2012), 2012, pp. 633–638. doi: 10.1063/1.4757548.
  45. [45] Ł. Czekajło and Z. Lendzion-Bieluń, “Wustite based iron-cobalt catalyst for ammonia synthesis,” Catalysis Today, vol. 286, pp. 114–117, May 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2016.11.013.
  46. [46] X. Li, X. Zhang, H. O. Everitt, and J. Liu, “Light-Induced Thermal Gradients in Ruthenium Catalysts Significantly Enhance Ammonia Production,” Nano Letters, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1706–1711, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04706.
  47. [47] Y. Ogura et al., “Efficient ammonia synthesis over a Ru/La 0.5 Ce 0.5 O 1.75 catalyst pre-reduced at high temperature,” Chemical Science, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 2230–2237, 2018, doi: 10.1039/C7SC05343F.
  48. [48] V. Kyriakou, I. Garagounis, E. Vasileiou, A. Vourros, and M. Stoukides, “Progress in the Electrochemical Synthesis of Ammonia,” Catalysis Today, vol. 286, pp. 2–13, May 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2016.06.014.
  49. [49] M. L. Garcia and L. T. Angenent, “Interaction between temperature and ammonia in mesophilic digesters for animal waste treatment,” Water Research, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 2373–2382, May 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.02.036.
  50. [50] N. Yahya, P. Puspitasari, and N. H. Noordin, “Ammonia Synthesis Using Magnetically Induced Reaction,” Defect and Diffusion Forum, vol. 334–335, pp. 329–336, Feb. 2013, doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.334-335.329.
Article Metrics
23
Views
22
Downloads

SCITE

DIMENSIONS

Publication Information
Published June 30, 2025
Section Articles
Copyright Copyright (c) 2025 Poppy Puspitasari, Nandang Mufti, Ahmad Atif Fikri, Deny Yudo Wahyudi, Maizatul Shima binti Shaharun, Anisa Ur Rahmah, Diki Dwi Pramono
Keywords
  • Ammonia synthesis
  • Nanocatalysts
  • MIM
  • RSM
  • CCD