Paedagogie
Articles
Efektivitas Metode Presentasi dalam Pembelajaran terhadap Pengembangan Nalar Kritis Mahasiswa: Studi Kualitatif
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of presentation-based learning in developing students’ critical thinking skills. This research uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive method. The subjects of this study were five students who participated in presentation-based learning. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and analyzed using an interactive model consisting of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The results show that presentation-based learning is the dominant method used in the classroom; however, it has not been fully effective in developing students’ critical thinking. This is indicated by low student participation, limited understanding of the material, and lack of interaction during the learning process. Therefore, more optimal learning management is needed to improve the quality of education.
Keywords
Presentation Method; Critical Thinking; Learning; StudentsReferences
- Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning. Longman.
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice-Hall.
- Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. Open University Press.
- Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning. ASHE-ERIC.
- Brookfield, S. D. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
- Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills. ASCD.
- Chakarvarti, P. (2023). Investigating the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Undergraduate Students. Journal of Education Review Provision, 2(3), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.55885/jerp.v2i3.192
- Cheng, C. (2026). A Review of Benefits, Challenges, and Strategies of Students’ Oral Presentation in Higher Education. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BASIC EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 03. https://doi.org/10.14421/8r0xp858
- Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243.
- Ennis, R. H. (2015). Critical thinking: A streamlined conception. Teaching Philosophy, 38(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil20153811
- Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.
- Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance. PNAS, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
- Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-learning in the 21st century. Routledge.
- Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. Psychology Press.
- Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. Routledge.
- Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 1–12.
- Kahu, E. R. (2013). Student engagement framework. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773.
- Kember, D. (2016). Understanding student motivation. Educational Research Review, 18, 1–14.
- Love Concepcion, W. E., Garcia-Bolaños, J., Mae Corpuz Nadia E H Ali, A. B., & Mae Ordoviz, J. F. (2023). GLOSSOPHOBIA AMONG SCIENCE MAJOR STUDENTS: LEVEL, EFFECTS, AND COPING MECHANISMS IN CLASSROOM PRESENTATION PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION: A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL Glossophobia Among Science Major Students: Level, Effects, and Coping Mechanisms in Classroom Presentation. Psych Educ, 15(3), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10154692
- Matthew B. Miles, A. Michael Huberman, & Johnny Saldana. (2014). Qualitative-Data-Analysis.
- Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
- Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2014). Formative assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 199–218.
- Ormrod, J. E. (2020). Educational psychology. Pearson.
- Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2019). Critical thinking concepts. Foundation for Critical Thinking.
- Paulsen, M. B., & Feldman, K. A. (2015). Teaching effectiveness. Review of Educational Research, 85(1), 1–43.
- Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
- Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
- Prof. Dr. Sugiyono. (2020). METODE PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF.
- Rita Fiantika, F., Wasil, M., & Jumiyati, S. (2022). METODOLOGI PENELITIAN KUALITATIF. www.globaleksekutifteknologi.co.id
- Samsudin, N., Mohd Hairi, H., Othman, N., Manshor, R., Syafiq Md Salleh, & Okfalisa. (2025). Exploring Aspects of Public Speaking Anxiety. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS, IX(IX). https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS
- Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories. Pearson.
- Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational psychology. Pearson.
- States, N. E., Lovig, C., Martin, K., Nennig, H. T., & Cole, R. S. (2023). Let Students Work: Analysis of the Role of Differing Facilitation on Student Engagement in a Large Stadium-Style Lecture Hall. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(11), 4237–4248. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00750
- Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
- Topping, K. J. (2015). Peer learning. Educational Psychology, 35(5), 1–16.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
- Xhomara, N. (2022). Critical thinking: student-centred teaching approach and personalised learning, as well as previous education achievements, contribute to critical thinking skills of students. In Int. J. Learning and Change (Vol. 14, Number 1).
- Zeng, X., & Ravindran, L. (2025). Design, implementation, and evaluation of peer feedback to develop students’ critical thinking: A systematic review from 2010 to 2023. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101691
- Zepke, N. (2015). Student engagement. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(2), 1–14.
- Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.