Paedagogie
Articles
Etika Tawar-Menawar Lintas Budaya: Integrasi Pragmatik dalam Pembelajaran BIPA
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the ethics of cross-cultural bargaining between Indonesia and China and its implications in learning Indonesian for Foreign Speakers (BIPA). This study employs a qualitative approach using a literature study design. The data consist of relevant scholarly articles on bargaining practices, pragmatics, and cross-cultural communication. Data were collected through documentation techniques and analyzed using data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The results show that the practice of bargaining in Indonesian culture emphasizes politeness of language, indirect communication, and social harmony, while Chinese culture is influenced by the values of collectivism, the concept of guanxi, and face oriented towards social relations and reputation. These differences show that there are variations in communication strategies that are influenced by the cultural values behind them. This research emphasizes the importance of integrating pragmatic aspects and cross-cultural communication in the development of BIPA learning materials based on authentic communication.
Keywords
BIPA; bargaining; pragmatic; cross-cultural communicationReferences
- Ahmadi, A., Husnia, F., Harpriyanti, H., Lismayanti, H., Susanto, M. A., Khurriyah, N., Sulaiman, & Sunarno. (2021). Kajian budaya, sastra, dan media (A. Ahmadi, Ed.). Graniti. www.penerbitgraniti.com
- AJEAKOH, A. C., YESILADA, F., & Ahmed, N. J. (2025). Cross-cultural negotiation styles in Shandong province, China: the role of cultural and emotional intelligence. Future Business Journal, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00605-8
- Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2013). Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 63(1), 68–86.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
- Chan, S. H., & Ng, T. S. (2016). Ethical negotiation values of Chinese negotiators. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 823–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.007
- Chintawidy, P. A., & Sartini, N. W. (2022). A Cross-Cultural Pragmatics Study of Request Strategies and Politeness in Javanese and Sundanese. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 4(1), 152–166. https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v4i2.152-166
- Fitriana, D., Sankina Windaru Imani, Azizah, H. A., & Saleem Mohd Nasim. (2025). Tindak Tutur Direktif Interaksi Jual Beli Masyarakat Pandhalungan. Lingue : Jurnal Bahasa, Budaya, Dan Sastra, 7(2), 194–204. https://doi.org/10.33477/lingue.v7i2.10374
- Haugh, M. (2013). Im/politeness, social practice and the participation order. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 52–72.
- Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1).
- Indrayanti, T., Cahyaningtyas R., S. R., & Rizqo, S. Z. (2024). Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Komunikasi Tawar-Menawar di Pasar Tradisonal Surabaya. Prosiding Konferensi Linguistik Tahunan Atma Jaya (KOLITA), 22(Prosiding KOLITA 22), 389–397. https://doi.org/10.25170/kolita.22.5994
- Nurfadillah, Wahid, A., & Hajar, A. (2023). The Use of Language of Negotiation between Sellers and Buyers at Karisa Traditional Market Jeneponto Regency. International Journal of Business, English, and Communication (IJoBEC), 1(4), 115–117.
- Permatasari, I. (2023). The integration of intercultural communicative competence in ELT settings: A systematic review. LingTera, 10(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.21831/lt.v10i1.59885
- Rahmatia, Agussalim AJ, A., & Nojeng, A. (2025). Makassar Speak Acts in Buying and Buying Interactions in the Pattallassang Market Takalar District. JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL STUDIES, (3), 407–416. https://humasjournal.my.id/index.php/HJ/index
- Razak, N. K. (2025). Tindak Tutur Lokusi, Ilokusi, dan Perlokusi dalam Interaksi Pedagang dan Pembeli di Pasar Tradisional. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 11(1), 376–386. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v11i1.5209
- Siregar, N. A., Harahap, R. H., & Saragih, E. (2024). Strategi Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia bagi Penutur Asing. Sabda: Jurnal Sastra Dan Bahasa, 3(2), 98–104. http://jurnal.anfa.co.id/index.php/sabda
- Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
- Spencer-Oatey, H. F. P. (2012). Intercultural interaction: A multidisciplinary approach to intercultural communication. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48(1), 1–50.
- Ting-Toomey, S. (2017). Communicating Across Cultures. Guilford Press.
- Wang, L., & Liu, L. (2024). Study on the Impact of Cultural Differences on Sino-US Business Negotiations under the Guidance of Cultural Dimensions Theory. In Journal of Education and Educational Research (Vol. 11, Number 1).
- Weng, Y. (2024). Research on Differences in Negotiation Styles and Promotion Strategies Under China-America Different Cultures. Transactions on Economics, Business and Management Research, 11, 2960–2254.
- Wijayanti, L. M. (2025). Kajian Pragmatik terhadap Tindak Tutur Lokusi, Ilokusi, dan Perlokusi pada Interaksi Pedagang dan Pembeli di Pasar Pagi Songgolangit Ponorogo. Lingua Franca, 4(1), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.37680/lingua_franca.v4i1.9052
- Xia, S., & Liu, W. (2025). Cultivating harmony across borders: Chinese cultural values and corporate communication in global contexts. Frontiers in Communication, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1650733
- Yundayani, A., Syafri, F., & Izzati, A. N. (2025). Indonesian Language for Foreign Speakers (BIPA): Industry-Oriented Material Development Needs Analysis. SOSCIED, 8(1).
- Zhang, Z. X., Liu, L. A., & Ma, L. (2021). Negotiation beliefs: Comparing Americans and the Chinese. International Business Review, 30(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101849