Paedagogie

Articles

Dominasi Scholar Academic dalam Kurikulum Pesantren: Studi Ideologi Kurikulum Pendidikan Islam Perspektif Michael Schiro

Muhammad Iqbal Rosyid , Muhammad Nur Adibuddin , Ahmad Faid Muzakky , Muhamad Yusuf Amin Nugroho

Abstract

This study aims to examine the dominance of the Scholar Academic ideology in the pesantren curriculum through the perspective of Michael Schiro. This study employs a descriptive qualitative approach using library research. The research data were obtained from primary and secondary literature discussing curriculum ideology, pesantren education, kitab kuning, the authority of kiai, learning methods, and santri evaluation. Data were collected through the tracing, selection, and critical review of relevant scholarly sources. Furthermore, the data were analyzed using directed qualitative content analysis by referring to Schiro’s four categories of curriculum ideology, namely Scholar Academic, Social Efficiency, Learner Centered, and Social Reconstruction. The findings indicate that the pesantren curriculum has a strong tendency toward Scholar Academic. This tendency is reflected in the central position of kitab kuning, the transmission of classical religious knowledge, the scholarly authority of kiai, and an evaluation system based on textual mastery. Nevertheless, this dominance is not rigid, as it still contains humanistic values through the formation of adab, exemplary conduct, khidmah, and santri mentoring. This study concludes that Scholar Academic Pesantren represents a distinctive curriculum orientation that integrates mastery of knowledge, continuity of tradition, and the humanization of santri.

Keywords

Scholar Academic; Pesantren Curriculum; Michael Schiro

References

  1. Aimah, S., & Nasih, M. (2024). Transformation of Pesantren as Humanistic and Futuristic Educational Institutions. Journal of Research in Educational Management, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.71392/jrem.v3i1.32
  2. Alyaqoub, R., Alsharairi, A., & Aslam, M. Z. (2024). Elaboration of Underpinning Methods and Data Analysis Process of Directed Qualitative Content Analysis for Communication Studies. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 24(02), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v24i2.573
  3. Anjaludin, & Pratama, A. I. (2025). Integration of Pesantren Curriculum with Digital Technology: Challenges and Opportunities in Islamic Education. 02(01), 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61159/icop.v2i1.594
  4. Arif, M., Dorloh, S., & Abdullah, S. (2024). A Systematic Literature Review of Islamic Boarding School (Pesantren) Education in Indonesia (2014-2024). Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman, 35(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.33367/tribakti.v35i2.5330
  5. Arif, M., Nasir, R., & Ma’arif, M. A. (2025). The Kitab Kuning Learning Model in the Development of Student Expertise in Pesantren-Based Higher Education. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v8i1.8
  6. Chand, S. P. (2025). Methods of Data Collection in Qualitative Research: Interviews, Focus Groups, Observations, and Document Analysis. Advances in Educational Research and Evaluation, 6(1), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.25082/AERE.2025.01.001
  7. Hidayati, Z., Maulidi, A., Niam, K., & Zainiyati, H. S. (2025). Curriculum As A Mirror Of Ideological Affiliation: Rethinking Pesantren Typologies in the Landscape of Indonesian Islamic Organizations. Journal of Contemporary Islam and Muslim Societies, 9(1), 201. https://doi.org/10.30821/jcims.v9i1.24574
  8. Idris, M., Willya, E., Mokodenseho, S., & Musthan, Z. (2023). Child-Friendly Islamic Boarding School (CFIBS): Realizing Humanistic Goals of Islamic Education. Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education, 7(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v7i1.382
  9. Istibana, & Aimah, S. (2024). Analisis Nilai-Nilai Humanis dalam Kurikulum Pesantren dan Relevansinya bagi Pendidikan Modern di MAN 1 Banyuwangi. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(4), 01–25. https://doi.org/10.62007/joupi.v2i4.379
  10. Julya, A. I., Nasiha, D., Aulia, M. A., & Sirojuddin, M. (2025). Dinamika Kurikulum Pesantren di Indonesia. 10(01), 105–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15642/joies.2025.10.1.105-122
  11. Kartikasari, V., Basri, H., Zakiyah, N., & Zakiaria, A. R. (2022). Humanistic Approach in Islamic Religious Education Curriculum Development. Belajaea: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.51192/almunadzomah.v1i2.320
  12. Khairani, D., Salminawati, & Dahlan, Z. (2025). Implementation of Islamic Educational Methods in Kitab Kuning Learning at NU Al-Qomariyah Islamic Boarding School. 14(02), 336–349. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32806/jf.v14i2.1369
  13. Lim, W. M. (2025). What Is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. 33(2), 199–299. https://doi.org/journals.sagepub.com/home/anz
  14. Maftuhah, M., Bastami, B., Heriadi, H., Tuaini, T., Surindi, S., Rahman, M., & Khozin, K. (2026). Transformation of English-Based Kitab Kuning Learning Methods Through the Integration of Pesantren Tradition and the Modernization of Instruction in Islamic Boarding Schools. Scaffolding: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Dan Multikulturalisme, 7(2), 1146–1164. https://doi.org/10.37680/scaffolding.v7i2.9019
  15. Maftuhin, Hajjaj, W. A., & Taufiqurrahman. (2025). Manajemen Kurikulum Terintegrasi di Pesantren: Integrasi Kitab Kuning dan Kompetensi Abad Ke-2. 02(01), 321–334. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23960/almustofa
  16. Mas’udi, A. T. (2024). The Evolution of Pesantren Education: Continuity and Change in Curriculum and Management amid Modernization. Journal of Pesantren and Diniyah Studies, 1(2), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.63245/jpds.v1i2.23
  17. Mutammam, Anggraeni, D., Akhmad Afroni, Sutrisno, Aisyah Zubaidah, & Irfanullah, G. (2025). Adaptation and Transformation of Pesantren Education in Facing The Era of Muslim Society 5.0. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(3), 705–726. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v7i3.114
  18. Neupane, B. P., Dahal, N., Dhakal, R. K., Hasan, Md. K., Villarama, J. A., & Fabros, B. G. (2026). Data collection methods in qualitative research: Researchers’ reflections. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 11, 1778160. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2026.1778160
  19. Noble, H., & Smith, J. (2025). Ensuring validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evidence Based Nursing, 28(4), 206–208. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2024-104232
  20. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  21. Rustamana, A., Adillah, P. M., Maharani, N. K., & Fayyedh, A. (2024). Qualitative Research Methods. 2(6), 919–930. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55927/marcopolo.v2i6.9907
  22. Schiro, M. S. (2007). Curriculum Theory: Conflicting Visions and Enduring Concerns. SAGE Publications.
  23. Schlunegger, M. C., Zumstein-Shaha, M., & Palm, R. (2024). Methodologic and Data-Analysis Triangulation in Case Studies: A Scoping Review. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 46(8), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459241263011
  24. Sunarya, E., & Sassi, K. (2026). Curriculum Of Love: Efforts To Revitalise Humanism In Islamic Education. 7(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37567/ijgie.v7i1.4323
  25. Surawy-Stepney, N., Provost, F., Bhangu, S., & Caduff, C. (2023). Introduction to qualitative research methods: Part 2. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 14(2), 95–99. https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_37_23
  26. Thulo, A. (2026). Examining the Dominant Ideology in the History Curriculum: A Case Study of Lesotho’s Grade 9 History Syllabus. 3(1), 84–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.63081/uejtl.v3i1.129
  27. Villamin, P., Lopez, V., Thapa, D. K., & Cleary, M. (2025). A Worked Example of Qualitative Descriptive Design: A Step‐by‐Step Guide for Novice and Early Career Researchers. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 81(8), 5181–5195. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16481