Paedagogie
Pengaruh Pendekatan Structured Learning Approach (SLA) terhadap Pemahaman Konsep IPAS Kelas IV
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the effect of the Structured Learning Approach (SLA) on students’ conceptual understanding in science and social learning (IPAS) at the fourth-grade level of elementary school. The research employed a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental design, specifically a posttest-only control group design. The participants consisted of 38 students divided into an experimental group and a control group. Data were collected using an essay test that had been validated and tested for reliability. Data analysis included prerequisite tests (normality and homogeneity) and hypothesis testing using an independent sample t-test. The results revealed a significant effect of SLA on students’ conceptual understanding, with a significance value of 0.000 (< 0.05). The mean score of the experimental group (83.79) was higher than that of the control group (71.37). These findings indicate that structured, systematic, and activity-based learning effectively enhances students’ conceptual understanding. Theoretically, this study supports constructivist theory and the revised Bloom’s taxonomy by Anderson and Krathwohl. Practically, SLA can serve as an effective alternative instructional strategy to improve the quality of IPAS learning in elementary schools.
Keywords
Structured Learning Approach; conceptual understanding; IPAS; structured learning; elementary educationReferences
- Ali, M. M., et al. (2022). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif dan penerapannya dalam penelitian. Education Journal, 2(2), 1–6.
- Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
- Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2021). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (Updated ed.). Pearson.
- Ardyanti, N. K., Hitipeuw, I., & Ramli, M. (2023). The effectiveness of structured learning approach on students’ engagement and learning outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan, 8(1), 45–53.
- Atikho, R., Ramli, M., & Wahyuni, S. (2023). Structured instructional strategies in improving student learning performance. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 12(2), 112–120.
- Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
- Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Harvard University Press.
- Budiyono. (2016). Statistika untuk penelitian. UNS Press.
- D I Sdit, Bina Anak, & Bangsa Kota. (2023). Pengaruh pembelajaran terintegrasi terhadap kemampuan membaca dan pemahaman materi keagamaan siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(1), 33–41.
- Fahira, A., Setiyowati, D., & Hambali, H. (2025). Implementation of structured learning approach in improving students’ skills. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 10(1), 21–30.
- Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
- Ifrianti, S. (2019). Kompetensi guru dalam merancang pembelajaran efektif di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 4(2), 89–98.
- Murtadlo, A., & Aqib, Z. (2022). Strategi pembelajaran inovatif. Yrama Widya.
- Netriwati, & Aini, R. (n.d.). Validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen penelitian pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan.
- Nuryadi, Astuti, T. D., Utami, E. S., & Budiantara, M. (2017). Dasar-dasar statistik penelitian. Sibuku Media.
- OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results: What students know and can do. OECD Publishing.
- Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Orion Press.
- Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.
- Sari, R. (2022). Analisis kemampuan pemahaman konsep siswa dalam pembelajaran sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 6(1), 15–23.
- Sari, D., Jannati, E., & Marianti, A. (2024). The effect of active learning strategies on student achievement. Jurnal Pendidikan, 9(1), 55–63.
- Sianturi, R. (2022). Uji normalitas dan homogenitas dalam penelitian kuantitatif. Jurnal Statistika Pendidikan, 3(2), 45–52.
- Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Allyn & Bacon.
- Subhaktiyasa, I. K. (2024). Teknik sampling dalam penelitian pendidikan. Jurnal Metodologi Penelitian, 2(1), 10–18.
- Viqri, M., et al. (2024). Tantangan implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka dalam pembelajaran IPAS. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 9(2), 101–110.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
- Winata, A. (2016). Efektivitas model direct instruction dalam pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(2), 67–75.
- Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.