Paedagogie

Articles

Kajian Sosiolinguistik: Variasi Bahasa Jargon Pada Film “Bebas”

Marrieta Moddies Swara , Verawati Fajrin , Widya Gusvita Gusvita , Ina , Elda Mnemonica Rosadi , Aziz Fauzi

Published
8 September 2026

Vol. 21 No. 3 (2026): In Progress
Pages 2314-2324

DOI

Open Access
Share

Abstract

This study examines the use of jargon in the film “Bebas”, directed by Riri Riza. The film focuses on friendship, love and nostalgia, and features two distinct time periods: the characters’ high school years in the 1990s and their adult lives. The aim of this study is to analyse the use of jargon in the film “Bebas”. Jargon reflects specific cultural and social contexts, so this study examines the linguistic variations used in the film. A qualitative descriptive method was used to identify and categorise the jargon contained in the film’s dialogue and narration. The data collection methods employed in this study involved listening and note-taking techniques. These techniques were used to watch the film and record the variations in jargon to be utilised in this study. The data obtained were analysed using interactive techniques. The findings of this study highlight the importance of the role of jargon in strengthening characterisation, creating an authentic atmosphere, and conveying specific ideas or themes related to the story’s background and context. The analysis also shows that the use of jargon in the film “Bebas” can enhance audience awareness and participation, as well as improve the film’s aesthetic value.dalam bahasa Inggris.

Keywords

Language variety; Jargon; G-language variations; Film Dialogue

References

  1. Aini, Syarifah. (2021). Analisis Ragam Bahasa Film Bebas Sutradara Riri Riza. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan. JIMEDU., 1(1). https://jurnalmahasiswa.umsu.ac.id/index.php/jimedu/article/view/55/26
  2. Ardila, R. (2024). Wujud Bahasa Inge Ndai Sebagai Bentuk Pemertahanan Bahasa Dalam Ranah Keluarga Pada Masyarakat Lambitu. MABASAN, 18(1), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.62107/mab.v18i1.880
  3. Belembele, E. A. (2022). . Language Variations In Customer Service Service At Gusti Sjamsir Alam Airport Kotabaru. Mabasan, 16(1), 51–66.
  4. Chaer, A., & Agustina, L. (2014). Sosiolinguistik. Rineka Cipta.
  5. Cichocki, W., Kaminskaïa, S., & Hagar, L. (2024). Regional variation in articulation rate in French spoken in Canada. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 54(1), 126–145. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100323000154
  6. Cropley, A. (2019). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods. Zinātne.
  7. Dewi Marinda, C., Rijal, S., & Surayya Hanum, I. (2022). Variasi Bahasa Dalam Film Serigala Terakhir: Kajian Sosiolinguistik (Vol. 6, Number 2).
  8. Edhi, N. Asrining., & Parnaningroem, W. Dyah. (2020). Gaya Bahasa Satire Dalam Film Er Ist Wieder Da Karya David Wnendt. . 9(3), 48–56.
  9. Fauzi, A., Andayani, A., & Rohmadi, M. (2022). The Use of Speech Act Functions for Women in the 2020 International Women’s Day Demonstration in Jakarta: Feminist Study. Society, 10(2), 639–652. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v10i2.325
  10. Fauzi, A., Nadya, A., & Prasetyo, A. (2026). Analysis of Speech, Context, and Multimodality in Corruption Prevention Poster on Instagram Social Media. Disastri, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.33752/disastri.v8i1.11353
  11. Guan, Z., Zhang, P., Gu, H., Lu, T., Liu, B., & Gu, N. (2024). JargonFM: A Framework With Multiple Interpretation Modes for Jargon Understanding in Online Communities. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 11(2), 1853–1864. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2023.3281674
  12. Haryono, A. (2012). Perubahan dan perkembangan bahasa: Tinjauan historis dan sosiolinguistik. Diss. Udayana University.
  13. Herwani, S. (2024). Tindak Tutur Ekspresif Pendidik Dan Peserta Didik Dalam Interkasi Pembelajaran Di Smp Negeri 2 Jati Kudus: Perspektif Pragmatik. MABASAN, 18(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.62107/mab.v18i1.791
  14. House, J., & Kadar, D. Z. (2021). Cross-cultural pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Ilmi, M., & Baehaqie, I. (2021). Tindak Tutur Ilokusi pada Program Acara Talk Show Mata Najwa Episode Gus Mus dan Negeri Teka-Teki. Jurnal Sastra Indonesia, 10(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.15294/jsi.v10i1.40396
  16. Iskandar, F., Agustian, J. F., & Hadi Putri, N. Q. (2021). Analisis Penggunaan Jargon Bahasa Komunitas Game Online PUBG Mobile di Kota Samarinda. Adjektiva: Educational Languages and Literature Studies. 4(2), 59–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30872/adjektiva.v4i2.1456
  17. Islam, A., Burhanuddin, & Saharudin. (2021). Tindak Tutur Ilokusi dalam Talkshow Indonesia Lawyers Club. MABASAN, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.26499/mab.v15i2.458
  18. Kadar, D. Z., House, J., Liu Fengguang, & Jiao Lin. (2023). Self-denigration in Chinese: An interactional speech act approach. Language & Communication. 88, 153–167.
  19. Krejčová, E. (2025). THE NEW POLITICAL JARGON – SUBSTANDARD IN CRISIS OF COMMUNICATION. Studia Slavica (Czech Republic), 29(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.15452/StudiaSlavica.2025.29.0003
  20. Lake, M., & Tegegne, T. (2022). Agricultural Domain-Specific Jargon Words Identification in Amharic Text. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, LNICST, 411 LNICST, 412–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93709-6_27
  21. Machu, M. (2021). Perbandingan Kelas Kata Bahasa Indonesia Dengan Bahasa Melayu Thailand Selatan. Edu-Kata, 7(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52166/kata.v6i1.1768
  22. Madanat, R. (2022a). Understanding Colloquial Expressions in Mechanics’ Jargon: Case Study of Colloquial English and Jordanian Mechanics Jargons. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 49(2), 551–560. https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v49i2.1813
  23. https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v49i2.1813
  24. Marsili, N., & Green, M. (2021). Assertion: A (partly) social speech act. Journal of Pragmatics, 181, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.03.016
  25. Octavia, W. (2018). Variasi jargon chatting whatsapp grup mahasiswa Tadris Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Kata: Penelitian Tentang Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra , 2(2), 317–325. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22216/jk.v2i2.3644
  26. Paoli, S., & Davidson, H. (2023). Pragmatic markers and verba dicendi: An investigation of Mauritian Creole. Journal of Pragmatics, 214, 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.06.011
  27. Pratiwi, V. U., & Rohmadi, M. (2021). Pragmatic approach to Indonesian speaking skills for student vocational high schools. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v7n4.1795
  28. Rohmadi, M., Fauzi, A., Hubi, Z. B., & Pratama, A. (2023). Cak Lontong’s Humorous Discourse on Youtube Media in Pragmatic Perspective. KEMBARA Journal of Scientific Language Literature and Teaching, 9(2), 376–386. https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v9i2.26855
  29. Soedjarwo, G. N. (2020). Persuasion Act in the Proposal Movie. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 2(1), 50–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1836/jopr.v2i1.50-67
  30. Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (Untuk penelitian yang bersifat: eksploratif, enterpretif, interaktif dan konstruktif). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif.
  31. Wood, M., & Gupta, A. (2021). Identifying and classifying medical jargon through analysis of recorded standardized patient encounters. Patient Education and
  32. Counseling, 104(8), 2122–2125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.026
  33. Xuan, Z., & Aziz Hussin, A. (2024). Semantic montage: Cognitive insights for understanding film language in Chinese context. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 5(1), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.58256/0chx9h37
Article Metrics
11
Views
9
Downloads

SCITE

DIMENSIONS

Publication Information
Published 8 September 2026
Section Articles
Copyright Copyright (c) 2026 Paedagogie
Keywords
  • Language variety
  • Jargon
  • G-language variations
  • Film Dialogue