Paedagogie

Artikel

Adopsi, Implementasi, dan Integrasi Teknologi dalam Tridarma Perguruan Tinggi untuk Smart Campus

Stefani Made Ayu Artharini Koesanto , Gunawan Wiradharma , Mario Aditya Prasetyo , Luthfi Faishal Fauzi

Published
13 Februari 2026

Vol 21 No 1 (2026)
Pages 307-318

DOI

Open Access
Share

Abstrak

Transformasi menuju smart campus bukan lagi sebuah pilihan, melainkan kebutuhan mendesak bagi perguruan tinggi di Indonesia untuk bertahan dan unggul di era digital. Implementasi teknologi dalam tridarma perguruan tinggi menjadi kunci untuk meningkatkan efisiensi, mutu pendidikan, dan daya saing global. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji adopsi, implementasi, dan integrasi teknologi dalam pelaksanaan tridarma di perguruan tinggi Indonesia dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terbentuknya model ekosistem pembelajaran digital yang terdiri dari komponen-komponen utama: infrastruktur teknologi yang kuat (internet dan Wi-Fi kampus); perangkat keras dan lunak, seperti, LMS, sumber daya manusia yang kompeten melalui pelatihan berkelanjutan; dan keterlibatan aktif mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran digital. Komponen lain yang mendukung ekosistem ini mencakup konten digital, evaluasi berbasis data, kebijakan institusional seperti teknologi hijau, interoperabilitas sistem, dan alat komunikasi digital. Tantangan utama dalam implementasi adalah literasi digital yang belum merata, keterbatasan pendanaan, dan resistensi terhadap perubahan. Namun, melalui strategi pelatihan rutin, penguatan kebijakan, dan manajemen perubahan yang inklusif, smart campus di Indonesia berpotensi menjadi strategi kunci untuk menciptakan pendidikan tinggi yang adaptif, inovatif, dan berdaya saing global.

Keywords

smart campus; ekosistem digital; pendidikan tinggi; adopsi teknologi; literasi digital

Referensi

  1. Abbas, J. (2020). HEISQUAL: A modern approach to measure service quality in higher education institutions. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67(January), 100933. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100933
  2. Abuhmaid, A. (2011). ICT training courses for teacher professional development in Jordan. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4). https://doi.org/https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ946628
  3. Ahmad, T. (2019). Scenario based approach to re-imagining future of higher education which prepares students for the future of work. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 10(1), 217–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-12-2018-0136
  4. Arisandi, D., Setiawan, D., Karpen, K., & Musyafak, M. (2022). Perancangan Media Pembelajaran Topologi Jaringan dengan Augmented Reality di Program Studi Teknik Informatika. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(1), 1487–1497. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i1.2231
  5. Bae, Y., Bhattacharya, S., Cui, B., Lee, S., Li, Y., Zhang, L., Im, P., Adetola, V., Vrabie, D., Leach, M., & Kuruganti, T. (2021). Sensor impacts on building and HVAC controls: A critical review for building energy performance. Advances in Applied Energy, 4(June), 100068. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2021.100068
  6. Bhushan, B., Sinha, P., Sagayam, K. M., & J, A. (2021). Untangling blockchain technology: A survey on state of the art, security threats, privacy services, applications and future research directions. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 90(October), 106897. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2020.106897
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  8. Chryssou, C. E. (2020). University–industry interactions in the Sultanate of Oman: Challenges and opportunities. Industry and Higher Education, 34(5), 342–357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422219896748
  9. Cohen-Shacham, E., Andrade, A., Dalton, J., Dudley, N., Jones, M., Kumar, C., Maginnis, S., Maynard, S., Nelson, C. R., Renaud, F. G., Welling, R., & Walters, G. (2019). Core principles for successfully implementing and upscaling Nature-based Solutions. Environmental Science & Policy, 98(June 2018), 20–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.04.014
  10. Cresswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approach. Sage.
  11. Desai, R. R., & Kim, J. (2023). Bibliographic and Text Analysis of Research on Implementation of the Internet of Things to Support Education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 34(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/https://aisel.aisnet.org/jise/vol34/iss2/6/
  12. Fatayah, F., Yuliana, I. F., & Priyasmika, R. (2022). STEM Integrated Chemistry Learning Effectiveness (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) in the Time of Covid-19. JCER (Journal of Chemistry Education Research), 6(1), 72–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26740/jcer.v6n1.p72-76
  13. Fominykh, M., Weidlich, J., Kalz, M., & Hybertsen, I. D. (2022). What do they TEL(L)? A systematic analysis of master programs in technology-enhanced learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00305-7
  14. García-Morales, V. J., Martín-Rojas, R., & Garde-Sánchez, R. (2020). How to Encourage Social Entrepreneurship Action? Using Web 2.0 Technologies in Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(2), 329–350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04216-6
  15. Guangul, F. M., Suhail, A. H., Khalit, M. I., & Khidhir, B. A. (2020). Challenges of Remote Assessment in Higher Education in the Context of COVID-19: A Case Study of Middle East College. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32, 519–535. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020- 09340-w
  16. Hartman, R. J., Townsend, M. B., & Jackson, M. (2019). Educators’ perceptions of technology integration into the classroom: a descriptive case study. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning, 12(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-03-2019-0044
  17. Hidayat, D. S., & Sensuse, D. I. (2022). Knowledge Management Model for Smart Campus in Indonesia. Data, 7(1), 7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/data7010007
  18. Lim, C. P., Wang, T., & Graham, C. (2019). Driving, sustaining and scaling up blended learning practices in higher education institutions: a proposed framework. Innovation and Education, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s42862-019-0002-0
  19. Lv, C., Shao, C., & Lee, C.-C. (2021). Green technology innovation and financial development: Do environmental regulation and innovation output matter? Energy Economics, 98, 105237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105237
  20. Nwajiuba, C. A., Igwe, P. A., Akinsola-Obatolu, A. D., Ituma, A., & Binuomote, M. O. (2020). What can be done to improve higher education quality and graduate employability in Nigeria? A stakeholder approach. Industry and Higher Education, 34(5), 358–367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422219901102
  21. Pratama, N. R., & Hasan, M. (2025). Penguatan Keterampilan Digital Melalui Pendidikan Vokasi untuk Meningkatkan Daya Saing Pemuda Kota Makassar di Pasar Kerja Lokal. Jurnal Pemuda Indonesia, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.65125/9b5sr369
  22. Pumptow, M., & Brahm, T. (2021). Students’ Digital Media Self-Efficacy and Its Importance for Higher Education Institutions: Development and Validation of a Survey Instrument. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning, 26(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09463-5
  23. Putra, M. S., Lasmawan, I. W., Suharta, I. G. P., & Widiana, I. W. (2025). Transformasi Pendidikan di Era Digital Solusi Kreatif dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Dan Lingkungan, 3(2), 68–78.
  24. Rahiem, M. D. H. (2020). The emergency remote learning experience of university students in Indonesia amidst the COVID-19 crisis. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(6), 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.6.1.
  25. Reddy, P., Sharma, B., & Chaudhary, K. (2022). Digital literacy: a review in the South Pacific. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 34(1), 83–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09280-4
  26. Rysavy, M. D. T., & Michalak, R. (2020). Working from Home: How We Managed Our Team Remotely with Technology. Journal of Library Administration, 60(5), 532–542. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2020.1760569
  27. Salasâ€Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVIDâ€19 pandemic: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 593–619. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13190
  28. Sarmini, Gamaputra, G., Alrianingrum, S., & Rizaq, A. D. B. El. (2025). Ekspansi Pendidikan Tinggi: Harapan, Tantangan, dan Peluang Transformasi Sosial. Kramantara JS.
  29. Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D.Bandung:Alfabeta. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R & D.Bandung:Alfabeta. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  30. Suryana, A., Karim, A. A., & Sapriya, S. (2018). Manajemen Capacity Building Tenaga Administrasi Sekolah Di Sekolah Laboratorium UPI. Pedagogia, 15(3), 250265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17509/pdgia.v15i3.11021
  31. Tamrin, Ilyas, S., Nasution, K., Ginting, B., & Saidin. (2023). Optimalisasi Transformasi Tridharma Perguruan Tinggi di Era Disrupsi. USU.
  32. Tan, S. Y., Taeihagh, A., & Pande, D. (2023). Data Sharing in Disruptive Technologies: Lessons from Adoption of Autonomous Systems in Singapore. Policy Design and Practice, 6(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2022.2162247
  33. Valverde-Berrocoso, J., Fernández-Sánchez, M. R., Dominguez, F. I. R., & Sosa-Díaz, M. J. (2021). The educational integration of digital technologies preCovid-19: Lessons for teacher education. PLoS ONE, 16(8 August), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256283
  34. Weiss, M., Barth, M., & von Wehrden, H. (2021). The patterns of curriculum change processes that embed sustainability in higher education institutions. Sustainability Science, 16(5), 1579–1593. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00984-1
  35. Zhong, Z., Feng, F., Li, J., Liu, X., Cao, Y., & Liao, Y. (2022). Making university and curricular sustainable entrepreneurship: a case study of Tsinghua University. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23(4), 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09797-y
  36. Zhou, M. (2024). Service Innovation in the Platform Ecosystem: The Case of Smart Campus in China. The University of Manchester.
Article Metrics
105
Views
48
Downloads

SCITE

DIMENSIONS

Publication Information
Published 13 Februari 2026
Section Artikel
Copyright Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Paedagogie
Keywords
  • smart campus
  • ekosistem digital
  • pendidikan tinggi
  • adopsi teknologi
  • literasi digital